Furthermore, Dr Peter Jansen claims to have not known I was a SCU client and that through my blog name only, he managed to locate me. His Press Release last Friday supports this.
It is very unsettling to think anyone can make a quantum leap from a random blog name to a full double-barreled name and current "confidential" address. A double-barreled name that only ACC knows. This is of great concern to me Denise as I am currently under Police Protection, on no electoral role, do not own a house or any other assets that would warrant my details on any database of any kind. My ISP address only directs, those curious enough to want to know, to a static internal Network address of which there are approximately 600 users. My name is nowhere on this system. I am also gravely concerned that the ex-cop who served me was my mother's old lover - her address just so happened to be the last known address that ACC has on record and, coincidentally, the last known "rendezvous" point where he met my mother, and in return, I met him.
I have already had the Police investigate into whether he pulled some strings within the Police Force to access my files - as he is an ex-Detective - and have been assured no information was passed from that direction. My file, as such, means that only one Detective knows my whereabouts and those details are not even stored on the Police database.
So, it begs the question.... how did Dr Peter Jansen find me?
This may not be of interest to you but it does led into your next suggestion which, is to go straight into a counselling role with someone reporting back to ACC.
To be perfectly frank Denise, until I get some assurance that Dr Peter Jansen did not access my personal file for his own private legal action, I cannot trust your Organisation to provide the safety and assurance that is required. Obviously, once I am in receipt of the "report" I will be in a better position to make a final decision. .
I appreciate your acknowledgement and subsequent apology into the lack of service I ought to have received. However, I remain embittered by the fact that I am only receiving this as a result of legal action thrust upon my by one of your employees, a Parliamentary inquiry, pressure from the Press, and (from my perspective) a gross invasion of my privacy.
Therefore, if you truly think an apology is in order, I want one from Dr Peter Jansen.
I look forward to your replies to my concerns.
From: http://nostalgia-nz.blogspot.com/2011/05/peter-jansen-calls-it-off-citing-that.html
ReplyDeletePeter Jansen calls it off, citing that the woman he
was suing needs the opportunity to continue her treatment. I gather he is also saying that that he was unaware that Jax was an ACC client. But of course he knew all these things when he began his litigation, it was all contained in the thread from which his complaints of defamation arose. And even if by some remarkable situation he was in the dark about Jax's situation he certainly knew when the story broke publicly, particularly when the Minister became involved.
Peter Jansen has an awkward, damaging touch. The 'pathways' programme he helped initiate to expediate treatment for ACC clients isn't universally lauded, in some quarters it is down right rejection as being a cost cutting exercise that created greater problems than its worth. His act, of what could be described as revengeful litigation, also held that clumsy touch. His withdrawal from that particular episode was again superficial, misleading - suddenly compassionate but citing excuses that don't weigh as credible or true.
Peter Jansen's pathway is more real than the prose he used to sell the original idea, Peter's pathway is in fact real and he walks that pathway now, alone, watched silently for his false steps and spiteful anger against those to whom he has betrayed himself.
Dr Jansen just wanting an apology doesn’t quite ring true, when you hear the story of the person who Dr Jansen is suing.
ReplyDeleteThis is a nasty case of bullying by a man who has headed up a process which is unethical, dangerous and in at least two cases that I know of, deadly. Good on K1W1 for holding Dr Jansen to account.
And I’ll add my own “honestly held opinion” – this is yet another abuse of power from Dr Jansen. “Completely Incompetent Prick”? You’re getting off lightly, Peter.
http://ludditejourno.wordpress.com/
Carmel before the house at Question Time
ReplyDeletehttp://inthehouse.co.nz/node/8411
I hate people like him, he is an evil man, no better than the school yard bully picking on the weak and infirmed. Those people in positions of power, have a responsibility to use that power for the purpose it was meant for, not to terrorize those who are less fortunate who come seeking help.
ReplyDelete3570 (2011). Carmel Sepuloni to the Minister for ACC
ReplyDeleteHas the report referred to in the Radio NZ article dated 7th May 2011 titled "ACC doctor drops court action against abuse victim" been made public; if so where can it be accessed; if not, why not?
http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Business/QWA/Default.htm?search=-546667627
3569 (2011). Carmel Sepuloni to the Minister for ACC
ReplyDeleteWhat was the process undertaken by ACC when investigating Dr Peter Jansen's alleged use of personal information of ACC claimant known as Jax?
http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Business/QWA/Default.htm?search=-1471709392
May 12, 2011:
ReplyDelete3595 (2011). Carmel Sepuloni to the Minister for ACC
How many of individuals with sensitive claims declined by ACC between 27 of October 2009 and 16 August 2010 have commenced recieving their entitlement of access to 16 hours of support sessions with an ACC registered sexual abuse counsellor?
3594 (2011). Carmel Sepuloni to the Minister for ACC
How many sensitive claims were lodged with ACC between 27 October 2009 and 16th of August 2010 and of these claims how many were declined?
Question 12 May 11
3593 (2011). Carmel Sepuloni to the Minister for ACC
How long, on average, does it currently take for those lodging new sensitive claims to begin recieving their entitlement of 16 hours with a counsellor after their claim has been lodged with ACC?
Question 12 May 11
3592 (2011). Carmel Sepuloni to the Minister for ACC
Has the Minister recieved any preliminary written or oral reports by the Special Claims Advisory Group regarding the implementation of the recommendations of the Sensitive Claims Pathway Review Panel in September last year?
Question 12 May 11
3570 (2011). Carmel Sepuloni to the Minister for ACC
Has the report referred to in the Radio NZ article dated 7th May 2011 titled "ACC doctor drops court action against abuse victim" been made public; if so where can it be accessed; if not, why not?
Question 12 May 11
3569 (2011). Carmel Sepuloni to the Minister for ACC
What was the process undertaken by ACC when investigating Dr Peter Jansen's alleged use of personal information of ACC claimant known as Jax?
Question 12 May 11
3551 (2011). Carmel Sepuloni to the Minister for ACC
Further to the Minister's response to Written Question 02761 (2011) how much is the 6 monthly review conducted by Dr Barbara Disley, of ACC's progress in implementing recomendations from the 2010 review of the sensitive claims clinical pathway going to cost in dollar terms?
Question 12 May 11
3550 (2011). Carmel Sepuloni to the Minister for ACC
Further to the Minister's response to Written Question 02761 (2011) will the 6 monthly review conducted by Dr Barbara Disley, of ACC's progress in implementing recomendations from the 2010 review of the sensitive claims clinical pathway be available to the public upon completion; if so when?
Question 12 May 11
3549 (2011). Carmel Sepuloni to the Minister for ACC
Further to the Minister's response to Written Question 02761 (2011) what date does the Minister expect the 6 monthly review conducted by Dr Barbara Disley, of ACC's progress in implementing recomendations from the 2010 review of the sensitive claims clinical pathway to be completed?
http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/PB/Business/QWA/Default.htm?search=-1594619330
Dear Dr Jansen
ReplyDeleteBasically it appears nobody has confidence in your ability as an ACC senior medical advisor. Therefore, if your ego prevents you from falling on your sword then please please at least do claimants, treatment providers, ACC and the Minister for ACC one huge favour and resign for family reasons. Denise, if you are reading this then the same applies to you.
For your consideration - thank you.
Yours sincerely
Everybody
Other questions Labour should of asked the Minister are:
ReplyDelete"Can the Minister explain how the Senior Branch Medical Adviser at ACC (Dr. Peter Jansen) got the full name from a pseudonym for Jax and then hr address, in order to serve legal papers on her when she is after Police Protection and on no public database?"
AND:
"Given Dr. Jansen’s continued incompetence in the area of Sensitive Claims and on the Clinical Directorate and the lack of any real progress by them in implementing the recommendations you insured us would follow the Independent Review of the pathway, when are you replacing him and the rest of the Clinical Directorate?"
From Chris (with thanks):
ReplyDeleteI do not work for ACC nor do I have or had any access to their system, but I do work in the world of IT. Although the general context of the comments about Dr Jansen are most likely correct, in my opinion there are some assumptions which may not be. Assuming all ACC claimant records are kept electronically and are most likely in a large database, Dr Jansens 'investigation' would have been most likely something like "Have I accessed the record of ... at the time of ....?" Since he requested it the results would have had to have gone to him as part of business procedure. None on Jaxs personal information would have been accessed in the investigation. It would have just been looking through database logs and seeing what Dr Jansen has accessed in the duration of the investigation period. Since Dr Jansens lawsuit is a private lawsuit as far as ACC as a business is concerned, rightly or wrongly, it none of their business. As far as some of their senior advisor's and managers go, I would not put it past them after reading comments about them and their media releases defending their actions. How Dr Jansen or his lawyer got Jaxs address only they know. It could be possible for the lawyer to find out the address outside the ACC system or even if they needed to find an address themselves. I don't know how far the law can go to get a persons address to deliver court papers. Unless he is made of Teflon and kevlar, no matter who he is, he would be in a power of trouble if he was accessing records he is not allowed to. Government are paranoid about privacy and database access is usually heavily monitored and they will do extensive investigations just at the hint of someone accessing information not required for their work.
By Chris on Jansen LOSES Legal Action on 5/15/11
Thanx for sharing nice blog posting....Free Claim
ReplyDelete