Amen................

ARGHHHHHHHHHH...

I can see you Jansen...

Over a week ago, an email was sent to Dr Peter Jansen, asking him some very pertinent questions about information he may have shared on my file in order to serve me with a $250,000 defamation law case, which he subsequently dropped the day I filed my rather insightful defense. 

One question asked straight out, whether he accessed my private and personal information in order to serve legal papers. 

It's a fair enough question, considering I am "suppose" to be at a confidential address, not on any Election role, credit databases, IRD have confirmed no one accessed/shared information and even WINZ were kind enough to report back the same when I inquired - you know, just the usual handful of Government agencies that do share information. 

The only one left to respond is... (drum role)...ACC - well that is, if you excuse the wee explanation given to me by Denise Cosgrove, which basically says. " I can't tell you how I know or what I did in order to find out but I don't think he accessed your file." 

Oh right-o-then. 

So why would Dr Peter Jansen open the email sent to him more than 30 times, at least a few times today, forward it to three other email addresses and still not think to respond?

Short of being "inside" Dr Peter Jansen's very own computer, there is this rather useful tool I found on the Internet the other day. It tracks your email. It reports back when it has been read, how often it's been read, and where he was sent/forwarded to... yes, a very useful tool indeed. 

For all ACC claimants out there, may I suggest you download this resourceful tool, you know, for those days when you feel you're going nuts cause you've emailed these guys a dozen times and no one replies and moreover, when they claim they never received your email or even saw it.

http://www.readnotify.com/

Bullshit and fucking Jellybeans!

DENSIS COSGROVE - ACC

Thanks for your further emails.

We’ve got your claim file ready but due to its size we’ve discovered that we can’t post it to a PO Box.  Bearing in mind you don’t want to pick it up at a Branch, perhaps we can courier it to a person of your choice (GP, JP, friend or relative)? We’d much prefer this to ensure your information remains private.

You also asked for a copy of the report into whether Dr Jansen accessed your claim file.  Your request was made under the Official Information Act and so a formal response is required by law, and that response is attached to this email.

I’m sorry to say that we’ve had to turn down your request and I know that will be disappointing but there is a good reason.  Because it was prepared for internal ACC use, the report contains a lot of information about how we carried out the investigation and we need to keep that confidential.  If we let that information out it could prejudice our ability to carry out future investigations. 

But we can provide you with the Report’s conclusion, which states that:

“Based on the system access records investigated, we can confirm that the particular staff member has not accessed the claimant’s personal information through ACC system applications.

We can also confirm that the particular staff member did not access the specific claim physical file in the Sensitive Claims Unit …”

While I know you wanted the full report, I’m hoping its conclusion is a first step towards you regaining faith in ACC’s management of your personal information.

XXX, you’ve got my phone number and I’m willing to discuss things with you at any time.  

Kind regards

Round & Round the Mulberry bush

Hi Denise

Further to my email a week ago, when I asked for you to email me to let me know whether my file had been sent, I have not received a reply. I was under the impression that this would take a few days and yet a week later, you are still yet to confirm having even sent it. 

I understand, from your previous email that you were concerned about that lack of service I received at ACC and I did regard your initial reply as an attempt to rectify those admitted concerns. 

I would like to add, therefore, that this is yet another unacceptable delay in basic communication.

1. I would like my file sent to me. When will that be done?
2. I want acknowledgment of my previous email. 
3. I want a copy of the report handed to Dr Peter Jansen on May 6th (12 days ago) that stated there was an investigation into who had access to my files.
4. I want an explanation into the delay of that report (number 3)

 Yours sincerely

Poll Result - Name Suppression

A Poll taken on K1W1Jax asked: "Name Suppression for 'convicted' child sex offenders be:

1. Automatically Given - No votes
2. Never Given - 29%
3. Up to the Victim - 77%

Currently, New Zealand has one national database for convicted sex offenders - the Sensible Sentencing Trust run on a voluntary basis and founded by Garth McVicar. This is a formidable site and extremely useful to those concerned, moreover, about these offenders once they're released. However, I dare anyone to try and locate a single convicted offender whose victim was related to them. In other words, you won't find any incest offenders because the Law, as it stands, grants them automatic name suppression, and in some cases, in spite of the victim's wishes - and that, as you can see, goes against what people think should happen. 

Reply to Denise Cosgrove - Part 2

[Part 2: MAY 11, 2011}

Furthermore, Dr Peter Jansen claims to have not known I was a SCU client and that through my blog name only, he managed to locate me. His Press Release last Friday supports this. 

It is very unsettling to think anyone can make a quantum leap from a random blog name to a full double-barreled name and current "confidential" address. A double-barreled name that only ACC knows. This is of great concern to me Denise as I am currently under Police Protection, on no electoral role, do not own a house or any other assets that would warrant my details on any database of any kind. My ISP address only directs, those curious enough to want to know, to a static internal Network address of which there are approximately 600 users. My name is nowhere on this system. I am also gravely concerned that the ex-cop who served me was my mother's old lover - her address just so happened to be the last known address that ACC has on record and, coincidentally, the last known "rendezvous" point where he met my mother, and in return, I met him. 

I have already had the Police investigate into whether he pulled some strings within the Police Force to access my files - as he is an ex-Detective - and have been assured no information was passed from that direction. My file, as such, means that only one Detective knows my whereabouts and those details are not even stored on the Police database. 

So, it begs the question.... how did Dr Peter Jansen find me?

This may not be of interest to you but it does led into your next suggestion which, is to go straight into a counselling role with someone reporting back to ACC. 

To be perfectly frank Denise, until I get some assurance that Dr Peter Jansen did not access my personal file for his own private legal action, I cannot trust your Organisation to provide the safety and assurance that is required. Obviously, once I am in receipt of the "report" I will be in a better position to make a final decision. . 

I appreciate your acknowledgement and subsequent apology into the lack of service I ought to have received. However, I remain embittered by the fact that I am only receiving this as a result of legal action thrust upon my by one of your employees, a Parliamentary inquiry, pressure from the Press, and (from my perspective) a gross invasion of my privacy. 

Therefore, if you truly think an apology is in order, I want one from Dr Peter Jansen. 

I look forward to your replies to my concerns.